False Dilemma

Also Known as: Black & White Thinking


A False Dilemma is a fallacy in which a person uses the following pattern of “reasoning”:

1. Either claim X is true or claim Y is true (when X and Y could both be false).

2. Claim Y is false.

3. Therefore claim X is true.

This line of “reasoning” is fallacious because if both claims could be false, then it cannot be inferred that one is true because the other is false. That this is the case is made clear by the following example:

1. Either 1+1 =4 or 1+1=12 .

2. It is not the case that 1+1 = 4.

3. Therefore 1+1 =12.

In cases in which the two options are, in fact, the only two options, this line of reasoning is not fallacious. For example:

1. Bill is dead or he is alive.

2. Bill is not dead.

3. Therefore Bill is alive.

Example #1

Senator Jill: “We’ll have to cut education funding this year.”

Senator Bill” “Why?”

Senator Jill: “Well, either we cut the social programs of we live with a huge deficit and we can’t live with the deficit.”

Example #2

Bill: “Jill and I both support having prayer in public schools.”

Jill: “Hey, I never said that!”

Bill: “You’re not an atheist are you Jill?

Example #3

“Look, you are going to have to make up your mind. Either you decide that you can afford this stereo, or you decide you are going to do without music for a while.”

Published in: on March 12, 2008 at 6:44 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , , , , ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/false-dilemma/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: