<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Reasoning Resources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reasonresources.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A guide to reasoning from Dr. Mike LaBossiere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:50:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Appeal to Tradition by Rick Warren &#38; Same Sex Marriage &#124; Philosophy Blog</title>
		<link>http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/appeal-to-tradition/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Warren &#38; Same Sex Marriage &#124; Philosophy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/appeal-to-tradition/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>[...] To accept this definition as correct based on its age would be to fall victim to a fallacy: an appeal to tradition. After all, people can be wrong for a very long time. As such, Warren&#8217;s appeal to tradition [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To accept this definition as correct based on its age would be to fall victim to a fallacy: an appeal to tradition. After all, people can be wrong for a very long time. As such, Warren&#8217;s appeal to tradition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Begging the Question by jesvin</title>
		<link>http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/begging-the-question/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>jesvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/begging-the-question/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>You must be feeling lonely for lack of comments. Im glad to help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must be feeling lonely for lack of comments. Im glad to help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Appeal to Tradition by blog.talkingphilosophy.com &#187; Rick Warren &#38; Same Sex Marriage</title>
		<link>http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/appeal-to-tradition/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.talkingphilosophy.com &#187; Rick Warren &#38; Same Sex Marriage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/appeal-to-tradition/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>[...] To accept this definition as correct based on its age would be to fall victim to a fallacy: an appeal to tradition. After all, people can be wrong for a very long time. As such, Warren&#8217;s appeal to tradition [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To accept this definition as correct based on its age would be to fall victim to a fallacy: an appeal to tradition. After all, people can be wrong for a very long time. As such, Warren&#8217;s appeal to tradition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Appeal to Tradition by Rick Warren &#38; Gay Marriage &#171; A Philosopher&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/appeal-to-tradition/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Warren &#38; Gay Marriage &#171; A Philosopher&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/appeal-to-tradition/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>[...] To accept this definition as correct based on its age would be to fall victim to a fallacy: an appeal to tradition. After all, people can be wrong for a very long time. As such, Warren&#8217;s appeal to tradition [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To accept this definition as correct based on its age would be to fall victim to a fallacy: an appeal to tradition. After all, people can be wrong for a very long time. As such, Warren&#8217;s appeal to tradition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Me by Jeff N.</title>
		<link>http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/about/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Sir,

I wanted to thank you for this really useful website.  I am looking to get into law school and one of my weaknesses is with reasoning, analyzing the flaws of a argument.  Do you have any advice on A)how I can improve my reasoning skills; B) take a course/or book that can assist me in strengthening my reasoning skills so I can analyze and make a case with laser sharp skills?

I am 30yrs old and I see how valuable this skill is not just with law but with work whenever I write.

Any advise would be appreciated.  Many thanks for the wonderful knowledge you share on your website.  Extremely helpful.

V/r,
Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir,</p>
<p>I wanted to thank you for this really useful website.  I am looking to get into law school and one of my weaknesses is with reasoning, analyzing the flaws of a argument.  Do you have any advice on A)how I can improve my reasoning skills; B) take a course/or book that can assist me in strengthening my reasoning skills so I can analyze and make a case with laser sharp skills?</p>
<p>I am 30yrs old and I see how valuable this skill is not just with law but with work whenever I write.</p>
<p>Any advise would be appreciated.  Many thanks for the wonderful knowledge you share on your website.  Extremely helpful.</p>
<p>V/r,<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Appeal to Authority by Reasoning, Autism &#38; Vaccines &#124; Philosophy Blog</title>
		<link>http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/appeal-to-authority/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasoning, Autism &#38; Vaccines &#124; Philosophy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/appeal-to-authority/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>[...] First, as mentioned above, there are celebrities, people in the media, lawyers and others who claim that there is a connection. People are often bad at discerning between legitimate authorities on a subject and people speaking on that subject who are famous for something else (like being an actor). When people make this error they are committing a fallacious appeal to authority. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First, as mentioned above, there are celebrities, people in the media, lawyers and others who claim that there is a connection. People are often bad at discerning between legitimate authorities on a subject and people speaking on that subject who are famous for something else (like being an actor). When people make this error they are committing a fallacious appeal to authority. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Argument from Authority (Non Fallacious) by Reasoning, Autism &#38; Vaccines &#171; A Philosopher&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/argument-from-authority-non-fallacious/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasoning, Autism &#38; Vaccines &#171; A Philosopher&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-69</guid>
		<description>[...] lawyers and others who claim that there is a connection. People are often bad at discerning between legitimate authorities on a subject and people speaking on that subject who are famous for something else (like being an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lawyers and others who claim that there is a connection. People are often bad at discerning between legitimate authorities on a subject and people speaking on that subject who are famous for something else (like being an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introduction to Fallacies by blog.talkingphilosophy.com &#187; Reasoning, Autism &#38; Vaccines</title>
		<link>http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/introduction-to-fallacies/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.talkingphilosophy.com &#187; Reasoning, Autism &#38; Vaccines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-68</guid>
		<description>[...] people tend to be more influenced by poor reasoning than by good reasoning. As I tell my students, fallacies tend to be far more persuasive than logical arguments. After all, people tend to feel far more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] people tend to be more influenced by poor reasoning than by good reasoning. As I tell my students, fallacies tend to be far more persuasive than logical arguments. After all, people tend to feel far more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Post Hoc by blog.talkingphilosophy.com &#187; Reasoning, Autism &#38; Vaccines</title>
		<link>http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/post-hoc/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.talkingphilosophy.com &#187; Reasoning, Autism &#38; Vaccines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/post-hoc/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] the case of autism and vaccines, people seem to fall into the post hoc fallacy. This allacy derives its name from the Latin phrase “Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.” This has been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the case of autism and vaccines, people seem to fall into the post hoc fallacy. This allacy derives its name from the Latin phrase “Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.” This has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Argument from Authority (Non Fallacious) by blog.talkingphilosophy.com &#187; Reasoning, Autism &#38; Vaccines</title>
		<link>http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/argument-from-authority-non-fallacious/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.talkingphilosophy.com &#187; Reasoning, Autism &#38; Vaccines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonresources.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-66</guid>
		<description>[...] lawyers and others who claim that there is a connection. People are often bad at discerning between legitimate authorities on a subject and people speaking on that subject who are famous for something else (like being an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lawyers and others who claim that there is a connection. People are often bad at discerning between legitimate authorities on a subject and people speaking on that subject who are famous for something else (like being an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
